The term “Synthetic Biology” was formally proposed in the first meeting of Synthetic Biology at MIT in June 2004. This primordial event discussing the role of standards and constructions in biology received a massive press coverage and triggered a new wave of thinking and excitement in the community. Using natural and lab-made parts one could construct new designs or replicate natural designs. Interestingly, the terms “synthetic biology” and “Biological engineering” are used interchangeably to indicate the science of construction in biology.
Over the last decade and a half, the term ‘synthetic biology’ has been enriched with distinct variants. For example, a chemical engineer may consider synthetic biology as an approach to design novel controls on metabolic pathways for a more predictable output. A metabolic engineer may want to install novel metabolic pathways or transfer chunks from other organisms using the new ‘synthetic biology’ terminology. A molecular biologist may build biological standards, rules of composition, long DNA synthesis and genome editing technologies under ‘synthetic biology’. For an organic chemist, it may be about synthesis of chemicals and biochemicals using microbial factories or creating a functional non-ATGC DNA. For a systems biologist, synthetic biology may be about finding how cells organize massively parallel and massively interactive processes and use the nature’s designs to construct novel and stable networks. The beauty of synthetic biology is that it leaves ample scope of innovation from parts to organisms.
Reg No: EKM/TC/667/2023 | Registered under The Travancore-Cochin Literary Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration Act 1955
